Click me to rate me!
Skyscraper Hall of Fame
 daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on oneforums map | privacy policy | DMCA | news magazine

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > World Development News Forums > Supertalls

Supertalls Discussions of projects under construction at least 300m/1,000 ft tall.
» Proposed Supertalls



Reply

 
Thread Tools
Old August 17th, 2010, 02:28 PM   #1
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,600
Likes (Received): 2043

NEW YORK | 432 Park Ave | 426m | 1397ft | 89 fl | U/C


http://markcareaga.tumblr.com/post/4...gned-by-rafael


===================================================================================================================


Demolition of some of the small buildings on 57th Street is imminent. Presumably, something will start rising here in 2012.

LIVE CONSTRUCTION CAM: http://www.432parkavenue.com/construction/

Renderings:

As of June 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertWalpole View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by meskida View Post

http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/140203164/original.jpg

At Central Park:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Funkyskunk2 View Post

http://markcareaga.tumblr.com/post/4...gned-by-rafael
__________________

wink!, rml-, Highcliff, the dogi, Copelandia and 4 others liked this post

Last edited by desertpunk; April 11th, 2013 at 02:19 PM.
RobertWalpole no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 
Old August 17th, 2010, 02:34 PM   #2
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,600
Likes (Received): 2043

Since this project was first conceived, it switched from very tall condo-hotel to stumpy office, then it stalled.

A condo-hotel is the only thing which would make sense currently.

Here's the initial story:


Drake Hotel on Park Avenue to be converted or redeveloped


20-JAN-06

Eastdil Realty has been retained by Host Marriott to sell the handsome, Swissôtel Drake Hotel at 440 Park Avenue.

The 495-room hotel was built in 1927 and designed by Emery Roth.

Various press reports indicated it may be sold for conversion to condominium apartments and one report by Brandon Keil in the January 17, 2006 edition of The New York Post, quoted a “source familiar with the proceedings” as stating that “The Drake will be demolished for a condo or mixed-use building of close to 70 floors.”

A mid-block addition to the hotel, which is on the northwest corner at 56th Street was erected in the 1960s.

It shares the Park Avenue blockfront with the handsome black office tower with arched windows at 450 Park Avenue. A spokesman at the hotel had “no comment” when asked about the reports and calls by CityRealty.com about the sale to executives at Eastdil Realty were not returned.

Mr. Keil’s article said that the sale also involves air rights from some properties on 57th Street between Madison and Park Avenues.

If the site were to be demolished, it is conceivable that a new tower utilizing air rights might become the tallest building on Park Avenue north of the MetLife Building at 45th Street.

Another very tall mixed-use tower has been designed by Sir Norman Foster for Aby Rosen nearby at 610 Lexington Avenue on the southwest corner at 53rd Street behind the Seagram Building at 375 Park Avenue.

The Drake has a polished red-granite one-story base beneath two limestone stories. Fauchon is the retail tenant on Park Avenue. The 21-story, beige-brick building and three setbacks and handsome three-story columns supporting large broken pediments on its avenue frontage at the top of its base and attractive façade decorations at its top. It has a large entrance marquee on the side street with sidewalk landscaping and a large lobby. In the early 1960’s, a nightclub and discotheque at the hotel, known as Shepheard’s, handsomely outfitted with Egyptian-style décor, became the city’s first major public disco.

In their brilliant book, “New York 1930, Architecture and Urbanism Between The Two World Wars,” (Rizzoli International Publications, Inc., 1987), Robert A. M. Stern, Gregory Martin and Thomas Mellins noted that “the apartment hotels of the 1920s fell into three notable categories: those that really did mix transient and resident tenants, and which were usually quite luxurious; those comparable in character to the era’s typical side street apartment houses that catered to a sophisticated and more or less permanent tenantry, usually single people and childless couples, many of whom were actively pursuing business careers; and those aimed at the many young, unmarried white–collar workers who were moving into the city to pursue business and professional careers, and which offered minimal quality of accommodation. In the first category, the Park Lane, the Barclay, and the Drake on Park Avenue and the Dorset and the Lombardy in the west and east fifties were among the most elegant….Emery Roth made a specialty of apartment hotels. The 1927 Drake at 440 Park Avenue…was in the superluxury category, with suites as large as twenty-eight rooms, large enough to constitute what Good Furniture described as ‘a whole self-contained city house.’”

The hotel is not an official city landmark.

Recently hotels in prime locations have begun to be converted, in whole or in part, to condominium apartments. The Stanhope on Fifth Avenue and 81st Street and the Mark on East 77th Street and Madison Avenue, for example, are being fully converted, while the Plaza Hotel on Fifth Avenue at Central Park South and the St. Regis Hotel at 2 West 55th Street are being partially converted.


Copyright © 1994-2006 CITY REALTY
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
RobertWalpole no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 29th, 2010, 12:17 PM   #3
University of HK / 香港大學
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hong Kong SAR / 香港特區
Posts: 3,378
Likes (Received): 244

another new possible skyscraper for NY. man, it's getting hard to keep track!
__________________
Sapientia et Virtus 明德格物
Industrial Organization, MSc

Highcliff liked this post
HK999 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 29th, 2010, 10:35 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Phobos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Porto,Portugal-EU(currently living in Brazil)
Posts: 9,206
Likes (Received): 58

This building will occupy the place of the now demolished Drake Hotel.Some other small,and quite pretty buildings were demolished as well.A big loss if you ask me.







Source:Wired New York
__________________
████
████
Europe:many countries,only one nation.
http://europa.eu/

goyo, Highcliff, the dogi liked this post
Phobos no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2010, 05:06 PM   #5
Registered User
 
ChitownCity's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: CGO, IL
Posts: 1,344
Likes (Received): 83

If its not going to architecturally compete with what was previously on this ste then there is absolutely no reason to destroy those buildings
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
ChitownCity no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2010, 10:54 PM   #6
BANDITO
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,086
Likes (Received): 3120

Please tell me that these buildings have not been torn down.
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
Hed_Kandi no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2010, 11:13 PM   #7
Balto
 
MDguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baltimore, Frederick, and College Park
Posts: 3,445

If these buildings must be torn down for this tower to go up, i am fully against it.
__________________
Back to Black

Highcliff liked this post
MDguy no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2010, 11:49 PM   #8
Registered User
 
Teslatron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 183
Likes (Received): 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by MDguy View Post
If these buildings must be torn down for this tower to go up, i am fully against it.
The Drake Hotel was already demolished 3 years ago.
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
Teslatron no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 2nd, 2010, 02:36 PM   #9
Mod
 
Ni3lS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rotterdam
Posts: 15,363
Likes (Received): 1394

Never seen it so never missed it. Although I have to say that the Drake hotel looks pretty in those pictures. I consider it a loss too.
__________________
LIFE IN LONDON

Please like my Facebook PAGE and check out my latest work :)
FLICKR: [2013] > London, Rotterdam, Pula, Krka, Dalmatia, Austria, Salzburg, Alps, Berlin, Dresden, Trier, Vienna, Bratislava, Munich, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2014] > Vienna, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Antwerp, Maastricht, Paris, Corrèze, Limoges, Paris(2)

Highcliff liked this post
Ni3lS no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 2nd, 2010, 02:52 PM   #10
Registered User
 
seb.nl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eindhoven
Posts: 1,294
Likes (Received): 167

What a shame... This has to become one pretty tower to compensate for the loss in historical atmosphere.
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
seb.nl no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 2nd, 2010, 02:56 PM   #11
Registered User
 
Turbosnail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,764
Likes (Received): 56

Those demolished buildings look very London - btw Phobos, your signature should read - "Europe many countries, many nations.."
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
Turbosnail no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 3rd, 2010, 03:25 AM   #12
Balto
 
MDguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baltimore, Frederick, and College Park
Posts: 3,445

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teslatron View Post
The Drake Hotel was already demolished 3 years ago.
Jesus Christ! New York does an incredibly poor job at preservation! Still, i don't want to see those little buildings disappear either. Otherwise, go for a tower there. Doubt it will be better than the drake, but go ahead.
__________________
Back to Black

Highcliff liked this post
MDguy no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 4th, 2010, 04:12 PM   #13
TIMBY
 
Skyscrapercitizen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Rotterdam, NYC
Posts: 28,326
Likes (Received): 1293

One of the charmes of NYC is the contrast of small buildings besides big ones. In many midtown locations this contrast is allready gone because there are only big building with big starbucks on the groundfloor. The city of NY should try harder to preserve some of those small buildings in areas dominated by big towers to keep important small city businesses alive! Otherwise big parts of midtown will become dull...
__________________
Volg RTM XL op Facebook en Twitter en blijf op de hoogte van het laatste XL nieuws!

Highcliff liked this post
Skyscrapercitizen no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 6th, 2010, 02:23 PM   #14
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,600
Likes (Received): 2043

It's sad to see these buildings go. On this site could rise either a nearly 300m residential or a 200m office.

image hosted on flickr

Derek2k3
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
RobertWalpole no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 6th, 2010, 02:42 PM   #15
Registered User
 
Marco Polo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,934

They could have been so easily incorporated into the new structure....

I am all for new development but new can be nicely blended with the old - then great value and respect are created. One goes both: higher and conceptually deeper.

It is such a shame that these beautiful townhouses were destroyed.
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
Marco Polo no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 6th, 2010, 02:43 PM   #16
HD
°°°°°°°°°°°°
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,206
Likes (Received): 126

wow, too bad. those were gorgeous!
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
HD no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 7th, 2010, 03:05 AM   #17
We will never forget
 
rencharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 579
Likes (Received): 69

If it is to destroy these buildings and build something worthless, like a simple tower of 200 meters ... Not worth it ...
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
rencharles no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 8th, 2010, 04:37 PM   #18
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Utrecht
Posts: 40
Likes (Received): 1

why ny government lets to destroy it's historical old town...as from Europe I don't understand that..in Eu.we try to save old town and in usa...it's no big deal to demolish beautiful old buildings...these building just needed alittle renovation and they would look great..
ZwarteRidder no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 8th, 2010, 04:42 PM   #19
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,600
Likes (Received): 2043

It's a shame. In the US, there is very little respect for history.
__________________

Highcliff, rychlik liked this post
RobertWalpole no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 9th, 2010, 04:39 AM   #20
BANDITO
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,086
Likes (Received): 3120

What an absolute failure on the part of NY planning department. These facades can easily be incorporated into the new building.

Here's an example of Jameson House by Norman Foster which is currently under construction in my home city of Vancouver.

Render:





Under Construction:





Early under construction photo showing preservation of facade:

__________________

cichus1, Highcliff, AAndreAA, salvador23 liked this post

Last edited by Hed_Kandi; September 9th, 2010 at 06:11 AM.
Hed_Kandi no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Tags
new york city, new york project, park avenue, supertall


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 03:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.2.5 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SkyscraperCity ☆ In Urbanity We trust ☆ about us | privacy policy | DMCA policy

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu